Tuesday, 30 June 2015

Quake!!! TU Delft: Delft University of Technology considers now all the ELSEVIER Journals as Fake, Junk and Bogus.

We have received this information from an email XXXXX@tudelft.nl

Dear Colleagues,

The Bogus - Fake ELSEVIER Commercial Company uses currently unethical tricks to attract papers and money. ELSEVIER Promise online publication within 2.06 weeks (see below)
They Spam everybody. Of course, we know the stories of ELSEVIER fake journals:
http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/27383/title/Elsevier-published-6-fake-journals/
and http://www.nature.com/nm/journal/v15/n6/full/nm0609-598a.html
So, Delft University of Technology downgraded al the ELSEVIER Journals as fake, junk and bogus. 
Inform everybody. 

This was the ridiculousness of ELSEVIER SPAM now:

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Signal Processing: Image Communication <journals@mail.elsevier.com>
Date: Fri, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:34 PM
Subject: See your research online within 2.06 weeks!
To: 

Can't see this email properly? Click here to view an online version



Elsevier
Fast Publication in Signal Processing: Image Communication
See your research online within 2.06 weeks!
PUBLICATION TIMES
Dear XXXXXXX

Signal Processing: Image Communication aims to offer you the fastest possible speed of publication, without compromising on the quality of our peer-review process. It’s just one of the many reasons you should submit your research to Signal Processing: Image Communication.
Current review and production time averages:
FIRST DECISION
5.09
submission to first decision in weeks
REVIEW SPEED
8.43
submission to final decision in weeks
FIRST ONLINE
2.06
acceptance to citable online in weeks
Information on timeframe and definitions
We look forward to welcoming your submission.
VIEW JOURNAL METRICS
Disclaimer: These are average speeds, and do not represent an entitlement or guarantee of publication speed.
This message has been sent to XXXXX@tudelft.nl  from Elsevier Communications on behalf of Elsevier Journals.
If you no longer wish to receive messages of this nature from us in the future, please click here.
Visit the Elsevier Preference Center to manage more of your communication preferences with us. 
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V.. All rights reserved. | Elsevier Privacy Policy 
Elsevier B.V. Registered Office: Radarweg 29, 1043 NX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Reg. No. 33158992 – Netherlands. VAT No. NL 005033019B01.
Elsevier
Read More »

Saturday, 20 June 2015

Another blog had discovered some years ago 42 parallel absolutely fake/bogus IEEE Conferences

Today our blog discovered a cluster of 30 simultaneously and in parallel organized fake/bogus/scam IEEE Conferences http://fakeconferences.blogspot.com/2015/06/30-fakebogus-ieee-conferences-are.html

Another blog had discovered some years ago 42 parallel   absolutely fake/bogus IEEE Conferences
http://acapam.blogspot.com/2012/11/the-site-httpbogus-conferences.html

The moderators of this blog justified their opinion as follows
These 42 parallel IEEE conferences are fake and bogus
1. Because it is over-advertized by SPAM
2. Spam Emails are sent from various and strange non-academic addresses like gmail.com, yahoo.com
3. In their emails they start with the phrase: "Apologies for cross-posting of the email."
4. So far, the majority of conferences is on the web without committee
5. Some of these conference have committee but they do not have serious committees with serious researchers.
5. Thys conferences is composed by 42 Conferences on everything related directly or indirectly with computational intelligence. The bogus IEEE conferences are listed below
6. Explanations about the review process are absent.


Now, IEEE hosts 30 scam, sham, fake, bogus conferences (See more details here:http://fakeconferences.blogspot.com/2015/06/30-fakebogus-ieee-conferences-are.html
Why so many? Because of money. This the site http://ieee-ssci.org.za/
of the 30 Fake/Bogus IEEE Conferences. What an academic robberry! And of course, the logo of the conference is a Beach somewhere in S.Africa. What a Science in front of coco palms! IEEE coco palms. Will you index also these coco palms in your IEEE Xplore Bogus Library?? IEEE is a predatory and brigandish club of evil money hungry thugs.  The following ridiculous Advertisement from 30 fake and Bogus IEEE Conferences spammed everybody in our University. Why? We are not members of IEEE.

Why have you changed 4 times the deadline for paper submission? Haven't you reached your target of 2000 papers yet which is translated to 1.7 million dollars?And where are the list of Reviewers, Mr. IEEE? Is it real that IEEE has been accepted more than 100 fake/bogus machine generator papers and had published then in its E-library for more than 10 years until Cyril Labbe contacted you?

http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763

Read More »

Wikipedia has just published an article for ELSEVIER fake journals

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australasian_Journal_of_Bone_%26_Joint_Medicine


The Australasian Journal of Bone & Joint Medicine (originally titled the Australasian Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine[1]) was a periodical presented in the style of a scientific journal, published by Elsevier but established and funded by pharmaceutical company Merck. Publication began in 2002,[1] and the last known issue appeared in 2005.[2][3] According to The Scientist:
Merck paid an undisclosed sum to Elsevier to produce several volumes of [Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine], a publication that had the look of a peer-reviewed medical journal, but contained only reprinted or summarized articles—most of which presented data favorable to Merck products—that appeared to act solely as marketing tools with no disclosure of company sponsorship.[4][5]
The publication was not included in the MEDLINE literature database and did not have its own website.[6]
In May 2009, Elsevier admitted that a series of similar industry sponsored publications had been produced, and that "high standards for disclosure were not followed in this instance".[3] In a formal statement, the CEO of Elsevier's Health Sciences Division, Michael Hansen, admitted that the practice was "unacceptable", and expressed regret for the publications.[7] Merck has denied claims that articles within it were ghost written by Merck and has stated that the articles were all reprinted from peer-reviewed medical journals.[8]
Several medical experts stated that their names were included in the Honorary Editorial Board of the Australasian Journal of Bone and Joint Medicine without their knowledge and consent.[9][10]
There were six such "industry-sponsored" publications brought out by Elsevier without proper disclosure of their nature, and which had the superficial appearance of a legitimate independent journal.[11][12] The six publications involved were
  • Australasian Journal of General Practice
  • Australasian Journal of Neurology
  • Australasian Journal of Cardiology
  • Australasian Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
  • Australasian Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Australasian Journal of Bone & Joint Medicine

Read More »

IEEE fake conferences with SCIgen papers and automatic or semi-automatic letter of acceptane. These garbage conferences of IEEE is a shame. Many Professors use the name of IEEE to organize junk IEEE conferences for paid vacations.....

Googling IEEE Fake we found new protests and new proofs for IEEE Bogus, IEEE Fake, IEEE Scam pseudo-conferences


There are several typical examples of fake IEEE conferences
For example, read this


Please, read more details for these fake and bogus IEEE Conferences here:

http://mathforum.org/kb/thread.jspa?forumID=13&threadID=2024574&messageID=6938268



-- Hi! I am an IEEE Conference Organizer! Send me any garbage-paper along with 890 USD

Read More »

Friday, 19 June 2015

30 Fake/Bogus IEEE Conferences are organized together. Why so many? Because of money. IEEE is a predatory and brigandish club of evil money hungry thugs. Ridiculous Advertisement from 30 fake and Bogus IEEE Conferences spammed everybody in our University

30 Fake/Bogus IEEE Conferences are organized together. Why so many? Because of money. This the site http://ieee-ssci.org.za/
of the 30 Fake/Bogus IEEE Conferences. What an academic robberry! And of course, the logo of the conference is a Beach somewhere in S.Africa. What a Science in front of coco palms! IEEE coco palms. Will you index also these coco palms in your IEEE Xplore Bogus Library??

IEEE is a predatory and brigandish club of evil money hungry thugs. 

The following ridiculous Advertisement from 30 fake and Bogus IEEE Conferences spammed everybody in our University. Why? We are not members of IEEE.
Why have you changed 4 times the deadline for paper submission? Haven't you reached your target of 2000 papers yet which is translated to 1.7 million dollars?And where are the list of Reviewers, Mr. IEEE? Is it real that IEEE has been accepted more than 100 fake/bogus machine generator papers and had published then in its E-library for more than 10 years until Cyril Labbe contacted you?


This is the 30-bogus-fake IEEE Conferences Spam. Do not submit anything to these 30 criminal conferences' cluster

 ssci2015authors@cs.up.ac.za
15 Jun
to ssci2015authors
Hi,

My apologies for spamming you today. Herewith just a
correction to my email this morning.

The paper submission deadline extension to 14 July 2015
refers to the IEEE SSCI 2015, and not IEEE SSCI 2014.

The deadline is for 23:59 on 14 July, but the submission
will remain open for another 24 hours to account for any
time zone confusion.

Official website: http://ieee-ssci.org.za/

Best wishes
Andries Engelbrecht
General Chair: IEEE SSCI 2015


____
___________________________________________
Ssci2015authors mailing list
Ssci2015authors@cs.up.ac.za
https://mail.cs.up.ac.za/mailman/listinfo/ssci2015authors


-- Dear Colleagues, I will not reject any paper in my IEEE Sponsored event. I swear.


Read More »

Friday, 12 June 2015

Fake ISI Indexing. Our Blog proves that the ISI Index is not a fair index. In fact they index many fake journals (like ELSEVIER) and many fake papers without any quality control. A plagiarized paper has been cited 101 times, according to Thompson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge. ISI cannot check plagiarism. This is the shame of ISI (Thompson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge)

Fake ISI Indexing. Our Blog proves that the ISI Index is not a fair index.  In fact they index many fake journals (like ELSEVIER) and many fake papers without any quality control. A plagiarized paper has been cited 101 times, according to Thompson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge. ISI cannot check plagiarism. This is the shame of ISI (Thompson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge)
See more details below and a real proof:

Clinical Cancer Research is retracting a paper on the immunosuppressive effects of glioma due to “evidence of duplicate and/or redundant publication.”
According to the retraction notice, the 2010 paper bore exceeding similarities to another one published by the same group of researchers six days prior. That second paper appeared in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, which – like Clinical Cancer Research — is published by the American Association for Cancer Research. Apparently, a reader tipped off the AACR about the similarity.

The corresponding author on both papers, however, has objected to the decision. “We do not agree with the decision regarding the retraction of the Clinical Cancer Research (CCR) Article based on the interpretation of duplication.”

Here’s the notice:
The article entitled “Glioma-Associated Cancer-Initiating Cells Induce Immunosuppression,” which was published in the January 15, 2010, issue of Clinical Cancer Research [CCR (1)], is being retracted at the request of the AACR Publications Department and the CCR Editor-in-Chief. A reader presented evidence of duplicate and/or redundant publication in two articles by Wei and colleagues published in two AACR journals. The articles in question, “Glioblastoma Cancer-Initiating Cells Inhibit T-cell Proliferation and Effector Responses by the Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 3 Pathway” (2) and “Glioma-Associated Cancer-Initiating Cells Induce Immunosuppression,” were published, respectively, in the January 2010 issue of Molecular Cancer Therapeutics and the January 15, 2010, issue of CCR. The editors of both journals and AACR Publications Department members investigated the matter further. We found that identical text was presented in the Materials and Methods and Results sections of both articles. In addition, the submission of these papers was nearly simultaneous, and neither paper made reference to the existence of the other. We contacted the corresponding author of the study to express our concerns, and, after several rounds of correspondence, suggested she notify her institution’s Office of Research Integrity (or comparable authority). After extensive review of the responses to our queries from the author and representatives from her institution’s Office of Research Integrity, we have determined that this is a case of redundant and/or duplicate publication as defined by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity standards (http://ori.hhs.gov/plagiarism-14).

It is our responsibility to correct the published record. In cases of redundant and/or duplicate publication, the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) recommends retraction of the redundant and/or duplicate article. Thus, the article entitled “Glioma-Associated Cancer-Initiating Cells Induce Immunosuppression,” which was published online in CCR on January 12, 2010, will be retracted; the article entitled “Glioblastoma Cancer-Initiating Cells Inhibit T-cell Proliferation and Effector Responses by the Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 3 Pathway,” which was published online in Molecular Cancer Therapeutics on January 6, 2010, will remain unchanged. A copy of this notice was sent to the authors.

However, Amy Heimberger at MD Anderson Cancer Center, the corresponding author on both papers, insists that the retraction was not warranted. She claims that the duplication simply represented “a baseline immunological phenotypic and functional characterization of the glioma cancer stem cells” required for each study:

 We do not agree with the decision regarding the retraction of the Clinical Cancer Research (CCR) Article based on the interpretation of duplication. For the CCR article the theme was focused on how differentiation effects the immune suppression of the glioma cancer stem cell. In contrast, in the Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (MCT) article, the effects of the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 on the biology of the glioma cancer stem cell was probed. Prior to either of these works, the immune suppressive properties of glioma cancer stems cells had not been described.  In order to develop either of the aforementioned key concepts, a baseline immunological phenotypic and functional characterization of the glioma cancer stem cells was necessary in order to proceed; thereafter the manuscripts diverge. More specifically, in the CCR article there is an extensive and comprehensive characterization of how the astrocytes and glioma cell lines impact T cell proliferation, apoptosis and Treg induction; the biological role of B7-H1 relative to Tregs was investigated; the contribution of galectin 3 in T cell apoptosis is probed; and the effects of differentiation on this immune suppression was evaluated. In contrast, in the MCT article, the effects of reversing glioma cancer stem cell immune suppression with an siRNA targeting STAT3 was evaluated; the effects of a small molecule inhibitor, WP1066, on immune suppression was determined; and immune cytokine profiling was performed. Both manuscripts make important and distinct contributions to the field that is further supported by the lack of overlap of associated citations. The manuscripts were submitted simultaneously and accepted within the same time frame and thus the reason why they did not cross reference each other.

The retracted paper has been cited 101 times, according to Thompson Scientific’s Web of Knowledge. Kenneth Anderson, the journal’s editor-in-chief, hasn’t replied to our request for comment, but we’ll update if he does.

William E. Gooding

Read More »

Monday, 8 June 2015

A fake (without peer review) conference accepts Abstracts and Publish the full paper without Review in an Elsevier Journal. Are we right when we say that ELSEVIER Journals are Fake?

A fake, bogus, junk, sham, scam (without peer review) conference accepts ONLY Abstracts and Publish the full paper after your payment without any (even elementary and skin) Review in an Elsevier Journal. Are we right or not when we say since 2006 that ELSEVIER Journals are Bogus and Fake? To be Honest ELSEVIER and SPRINGER VERLAG are fake and bogus publishers. If you do not believe it see these links
Enjoy now the SPAM from this fake, scam, bogus, junk paper where without any evaluation and without any review everything is published automatically in an Elsevier BOGUS Journal. Shame!!!

Call for Abstracts Submission

5th World Conference on Educational Technology Researches
University of Kyrenia, Kyrenia (Girne) – North Cyprus
15-17 October 2015 
www.wcetr.org

Dear Colleagues
·      Due Dated Abstract Submissions:  August 01, 2015
·      The WCETR – 2015 accepted full papers will be published in Elsevier Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences (ISSN: 1877-0428) and can be retrieved from ScienceDirect (www.sciencedirect.com) database and also submitted to SCOPUS and Thomson Reuters Conference Proceedings Citation Index (ISI Web of Science).
·      In addition, distinguished keynote speakers who are internationally renowned in the field will be giving presentations at the conference. You will also have a chance to discuss your works with the editors of the most respected journals.
·      Abstracts must be written in English, and can be sent as an email attach to wcetr.info@gmail.com  
     
Hope to see you in Kyrenia in Cyprus.


CONFERENCE SUBJECTS
WCETR-2014 includes all theoretical and practical knowledge about educational technology. For more information: http://www.awer-center.org/wcetr/aim.htm

PREVIOUS CONFERENCES
2014, Barcelona, Spain
2013, Antalya, Turkey
2012, 
Nicosia, Cyprus
2011, Kyrenia, Cyprus

FULL PAPER PUBLICATION
Read More »

Monday, 1 June 2015

Fake and Bogus Paper published in an ISI Journal with very high impact factor: "SCIENCE" (Source: NEW YORK TIMES www.nytimes.com)

From:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/29/science/journal-science-retracts-study-on-gay-canvassers-and-same-sex-marriage.html

Fake and Bogus Paper published in an ISI Journal with very high impact factor: "SCIENCE"
This journal (SCIENCE) retracted a highly publicized study reporting that attitudes toward same-sex marriage could be altered by brief face-to-face conversations with people who have a stake in the issue.
The study, published by the journal Science in December, came under question this month when a pair of graduate students trying to follow up on the work found evidence that the data had been misrepresented.
The study’s senior author, Donald P. Green, a prominent political scientist at Columbia University, asked that the study be retracted last week, after his co-author, Michael J. LaCour, a graduate student in political science at the University of California, Los Angeles, declined to furnish the raw data he had used to reach his conclusions.
Mr. LaCour did not agree to the retraction, the journal said. He could not be reached for comment.
More Details

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/29/science/journal-science-retracts-study-on-gay-canvassers-and-same-sex-marriage.html
Read More »

Friday, 29 May 2015

ASME Bogus Conferences. If you do not believe it, read the following story regarding these fake activities of ASME

ASME Bogus Conferences: The absolutely fake conferences in academia and see why.

Introduction:
As you know our blog do not sell protection to big publishers.
We have revealed (with strong documents) the hunderds  of IEEE garbage-conferences
See: http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/71/35/55/PDF/0-FakeDetectionSci-Perso.pdf
and http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11192-012-0781-y
See also 1100 fake and bogus IEEE conferences have been indentified recently
http://www.ieee.org/conferences_events/conferences/publishing/author_form.html

ASME Fake Conferences
ASME Conferences are also fake. They operate as commercial exhibitions rather than scientific events.
Our blog have discovered and have reported many times that those big ASME conferences of 2000 or 2000 individuals do not offer any kind of review.
Now we have the Proof:

Fluid mechanics article retracted with no explanation. It was a Fake Paper from an ASME Conference in Fluid Mechanics.

Fluid mechanics article retracted with no explanation.
It was a Fake Paper from an ASME Conference in
Fluid Mechanics.



An article published earlier this year has been retracted from the  Journal of Heat Transfer.
But the retraction notice gives no information about what was amiss.
The article is entitled “Neural Network Methodology for Modeling Heat Transfer in Wake Flow,”
and the retraction notice, in full, reads:
The above referenced paper is being retracted from the Journal of Heat Transfer.
We are unable to find a copy of the article online, despite the fact that the Committee on Publication
Ethics (COPE) recommends leaving retracted articles available online.
We contacted the manager of journals for the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME),
the journal’s publisher (who is listed as the author of the retraction), as well as the journal’s editor,
but have received no reply. We also reached out to the first and last authors,
located at university engineering departments in Turkey and Bahrain,
who we were able to identify in a listing on a Chinese library search engine.
We’ll circle back if anyone responds with more information.
The article has not been cited.




http://avoidpseudoscience.blogspot.com/2015/05/fluid-mechanics-article-retracted-with.html
Read More »

Tuesday, 26 May 2015

Scholars consider the IEEE Journals legitimate, but they believe that the IEEE Conferences are junk, predatory, garbage and bogus. More details: http://www.qualityofconferences.com/

Several colleagues created a new web page
http://www.qualityofconferences.com/
They also say that the IEEE, SIAM and AIP Conferences are junk, predatory, garbage and bogus.
However, some of them has published papers in IEEE Journals. Maybe, they consider the IEEE Journals legitimate, but they believe that the IEEE Conferences  are junk, predatory, garbage and bogus. More details: http://www.qualityofconferences.com/


Bell JBBell@lbl.gov
Bertozzi bertozzi@math.ucla.edu
Caselles vicent.caselles@upf.edu
Conti sergio.conti@uni.bonn.de
Ferris ferris@cs.wisc.edu
Francfort   gilles.francfort@univ-paris13.fr
Fritzson petfr@ida.liu.se
Geng zhigeng@pku.edu.cn
Ghil ghil@atmos.ucla.edu
Gonzaga clovis@mtm.ufsc.br
Hogan s.j.hogan@bristol.ac.uk
Holmes pholmes@math.princeton.edu
Iwasa yohiwasa@kyudai.jp
Kimmel ron@cs.technion.ac.il
Kusuoka kusuoka@ms.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Landman kerryl@unimelb.edu.au
Lewis mlewis@math.ualberta.ca
Lubich lubich@na.uni-tuebingen.de
McNeil A.J.McNeil@hw.ac.uk
Perthame Benoit.Perthame@upmc.fr
Piccoli b.piccoli@iac.cnr.it
Sagaut pierre.sagaut@upmc.fr
Swierniak andrzej.swierniak(at)polsl.pl
Westermann westerma@in.tum.de
Yu binyu@stat.berkeley.edu
Zhang pzhang@pku.edu.cn
Sejnowski sejnowski@salk.edu
Foster foster@mcs.anl.gov
Poggio tp@ai.mit.edu
Jain jain@cse.msu.edu
Estrin destrin@cs.ucla.edu
Grossberg steve@bu.edu
Towsley towsley@cs.umass.edu
Yu psyu@cs.uic.edu
Garcia-Molina hector@cs.stanford.edu
Katz randy@cs.Berkeley.edu
Salzberg salzberg@jhu.edu
Ullman ullman@cs.stanford.edu
Balakrishnan hari@csail.mit.edu
Sangiovanni-Vincentelli alberto@eecs.berkeley.edu
Jennings nrj@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Prade   prade@irit.fr
Aalst w.m.p.v.d.aalst@tue.nl
Tarjan ret@cs.princeton.edu
Agrawal ragrawal@acm.org
Gerla gerla@cs.ucla.edu
Jordan jordan@cs.berkeley.edu
Papadimitriou christos@cs.berkeley.edu
Huang t-huang1@illinois.edu
Vardi vardi@cs.rice.edu
Hinton hinton@cs.toronto.edu
Motwani rajeev@cs.stanford.edu
Koller koller@CS.Stanford.EDU
Abadi abadi@cs.ucsc.edu
Zhang hjzhang@microsoft.com
Yannakakis mihalis@cs.columbia.edu
Vetterli martin.vetterli@epfl.ch
Schölkopf bernhard.schoelkopf@tuebingen.mpg.de
Culler culler@cs.berkeley.edu
Jajodia jajodia@gmu.edu
Zhang lixia@cs.ucla.edu
Karger karger@mit.edu
Kanade tk@cs.cmu.edu
Shin kgshin@eecs.umich.edu
Srivastava mbs@ucla.edu
Chandrakasan anantha@mtl.mit.edu
Szeliski szeliski@microsoft.com
Zadeh zadeh@eecs.berkeley.edu
Boneh dabo@cs.stanford.edu
Dally dally@stanford.edu
Burgard burgard@informatik.uni-freiburg.de
Fagin fagin@us.ibm.com
Stoica istoica@cs.berkeley.edu
Sycara katia@cs.cmu.edu
Terzopoulos dt@cs.ucla.edu
Benini benini@deis.unibo.it
Finin finin@umbc.edu
Hendler hendler@cs.rpi.edu
Perrig perrig@cmu.edu
Dorigo mdorigo@ulb.ac.be
Aceves jj@cse.ucsc.edu
Johnson dsj@research.att.com
Horrocks ian.horrocks@cs.ox.ac.uk
Micheli giovanni.demicheli@epfl.ch
Yager ryager@iona.edu
Giles giles@ist.psu.edu
Halevy halevy@google.com
Peterson llp@cs.princeton.edu
Schmidt d.schmidt@vanderbilt.edu
Fox fox@cs.washington.edu
Greenberg saul.greenberg@ucalgary.ca
Halpern halpern@cs.cornell.edu
Schulzrinne hgs@cs.columbia.edu
Staab staab@uni-koblenz.de
Manna manna@cs.stanford.edu
Manocha dm@cs.unc.edu
Mylopoulos jm@cs.toronto.edu
Baraniuk richb@rice.edu
Crowcroft Jon.Crowcroft@cl.cam.diddy.ac.uk
Lenzerini lenzerini@dis.uniroma1.it
Micali silvio@csail.mit.edu
Weld weld@cs.washington.edu
Ayache Nicholas.Ayache@inria.fr
Cardelli luca@microsoft.com
Jain jain@ics.uci.edu
Kraut robert.kraut@cmu.edu
Nayar nayarcs@cs.columbia.edu
Vahdat vahdat@cs.ucsd.edu
Bellare @@
mihir@cs.ucsd.edu
Black black@cs.brown.edu
Chang sfchang@ee.columbia.edu
Handley m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Kahng abk@ucsd.edu
Lamport lamport@microsoft.com
Leighton ftl@math.mit.edu
Chazelle chazelle@cs.princeton.edu
Cox ingemar@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Dill dill@cs.stanford.edu
Fensel dieter.fensel@sti2.at
Garlan gasdick@cs.cmu.edu
Horvitz horvitz@micrsoft.com
Thalmann daniel.thalmann@epfl.ch
Trivedi kst@ee.duke.edu
Baldi pfbaldi@ics.uci.edu
Bertino bertino@cs.purdue.edu
Herman gabortherman@yahoo.com
Herrera herrera@decsai.ugr.es
Kung kung@harvard.edu
Malik angie@eecs.berkeley.edu
Nahrstedt klara@illinois.edu
Pevzner ppevzner@cs.ucsd.edu
Sandholm sandholm@cs.cmu.edu
Suciu suciu@cs.washington.edu
Widom widom@cs.stanford.edu
Abowd abowd@gatech.edu
Chellappa rama@umiacs.umd.edu
Cong cong@cs.ucla.edu
Dongarra dongarra@cs.utk.edu
Etzioni etzioni@cs.washington.edu
Franklin franklin@cs.berkeley.edu
Van Gool vangool@vision.ee.ethz.ch
Heckerman heckerma@microsoft.com
Kaufman ari@cs.sunysb.edu
Liu kjrliu@umd.edu
Pnueli amir@wisdom.weizmann.ac.il
Silberschatz avi@cs.yale.edu
Veloso veloso@cmu.edu
Agrawal agrawal@cs.ucsb.edu
Akyildiz ian@ece.gatech.edu
Amari amari@brain.riken.jp
Badler badler@seas.upenn.edu
Diot christophe.diot@technicolor.com
Floyd floyd@acm.org
Giacomo degiacomo@dis.uniroma1.it
Gottlob georg.gottlob@cs.ox.ac.uk
Kautz kautz@cs.rochester.edu
Kiesler kiesler@cs.cmu.edu
Littman mlittman@cs.rutgers.edu
Reiter jrex@cs.princeton.edu
Sandhu ravi.sandhu@utsa.edu
Sontag sontag@math.rutgers.edu
Gehrke johannes@cs.cornell.edu
Devadas devadas@mit.edu
Thalmann thalmann@miralab.ch
Srivastava divesh@research.att.com
Hill markhill@cs.wisc.edu
Hennessy president@stanford.edu
Joshi joshi@cs.umbc.edu
LeCun yann@cs.nyu.edu
Osher sjo@math.ucla.edu
Pavlidis t.pavlidis@ieee.org
Rabaey jan@eecs.berkeley.edu
Seidel hpseidel@mpi-sb.mpg.de
Smith phismith@buffalo.edu
Stolfo sal@cs.columbia dot edu
Abdelzaher zaher@cs.uiuc.edu
Awerbuch baruch@cs.jhu.edu
Brusilovsky peterb@pitt.edu
Calvanese calvanese@inf.unibz.it
Freeman billf@mit.edu
Graham graham@ucsd.edu
Han hanj@cs.uiuc.edu
Hellerstein hellerstein@cs.berkeley.edu
Karp stubbs@cs.berkeley.edu
Kuo cckuo@sipi.usc.edu
Malik sharad@princeton.edu
Manning manning@cs.stanford.edu
Nath badri@cs.rutgers.edu
Ni ni@cse.ust.hk
Nisan noam@cs.huji.ac.il
Reps reps@cs.wisc.edu
Varghese varghese@cs.ucsd.edu
Benford sdb@cs.nott.ac.uk
Bernstein philbe@microsoft.com
Briand briand@sce.carleton.ca
Domingos pedrod@cs.washington.edu
Druschel druschel@mpi-sws.org
Gross grossm@inf.ethz.ch
Lu slu@cs.ucla.edu
Muthukrishnan muthu@cs.rutgers.edu
Pedram pedram@usc.edu
Poor poor@princeton.edu
Roy kaushik@ecn.purdue.edu
Saltz JHSaltz@emory.edu
Tambe tambe@usc.edu
Yuille yuille@stat.ucla.edu
Abiteboul serge.abiteboul@inria.fr
Alur alur@cis.upenn.edu
Croft croft@cs.umass.edu
DeWitt dewitt@cs.wisc.edu
Feiner feiner@cs.columbia.edu
Guibas trish@shasta.stanford.edu
Hebert hebert@ri.cmu.edu
Kramer j.kramer@imperial.ac.uk
Kriegel kriegel@dbs.ifi.lmu.de
Larus larus@microsoft.com
Levesque hector@cs.toronto.edu
McCarthy jmccsstanford@gmail.com
Mehlhorn d1-office@mpi-inf.mpg.de
Morris rtm@csail.mit.edu
Luby luby@icsi.berkeley.edu
Myers bam@cs.cmu.edu
Naor   moni.naor@weizmann.ac.il
Naughton naughton@cs.wisc.edu
Ramchandran kannanr@eecs.berkeley.edu
Salesin salesin@adobe.com
Savage savage@cs.ucsd.edu
Selman selman@cs.cornell.edu
Shah shah@eecs.ucf.edu
Siewiorek dps@cs.cmu.edu
Snodgrass rts@cs.arizona.edu
Stonebraker stonebraker@csail.mit.edu
Subrahmanian vs@cs.umd.edu
Thrun thrunstanford.edu
Weikum weikum@mpi-inf.mpg.de
Wiederhold siroker@cs.stanford.edu
Blum avrim@cs.cmu.edu
Buneman opb@inf.ed.ac.uk
Carey mjcarey@ics.uci.edu
Dolev dovel@cs.huji.ac.il
Eppstein eppstein@ics.uci.edu
Jensen csj@cs.au.dk
Khosla pkk@ece.cmu.edu
Landay landay@cs.washington.edu
Lee wenke@cc.gatech.edu
Li li@cs.princeton.edu
Madden madden@csail.mit.edu
McKeown kathy@cs.columbia.edu
Michalewicz zbyszek@cs.adelaide.edu.au
Ostrovsky rafail@cs.ucla.edu
Satyanarayanan satya@cs.cmu.edu
Shasha shasha@cs.nyu.edu
Aiken aiken@cs.stanford.edu
Alonso alonso@inf.ethz.ch
Borriello gaetano@cse.washington.edu
Brayton brayton@eecs.berkeley.edu
Canetti canetti@tau.ac.il
Deriche rachid.deriche@sophia.inria.fr
Gelenbe e.gelenbe@imperial.ac.uk
Ghahramani zoubin@eng.cam.ac.uk
Harrold harrold@cc.gatech.edu
Kleinrock lk@cs.ucla.edu
Kurose kurose@cs.umass.edu
Lipton richard.lipton@cc.gatech.edu
Offut offut@gmu.edu
Pappas pappasg@seas.upenn.edu
Patt patt@ece.utexas.edu
Pearl judea@cs.ucla.edu
Qiao qiao@computer.org
Shneiderman ben@cs.umd.edu
Suri suri@cs.ucsb.edu
Baader baader@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de
Boutilier cebly@cs.toronto.edu
Chakrabarty krish@ee.duke.edu
Crovella crovella@cs.bu.edu
Ball tball@microsoft.com
Guerraoui rachid.guerraoui@epfl.ch
Harel dharel@weizmann.ac.il
Herlihy herlihy@cs.brown.edu
Hopcroft jeh@cs .cornell.edu
Horowitz horowitz@ee.stanford. edu
Ikeuchi ki@iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Jha jha@ee.princeton.edu
Keogh eamonn@cs.ucr.edu
Keutzer keutzer@eecs.berkeley.edu
Larsen kgl@cs.aau.dk
Lazowska lazowska@cs.washington.edu
Lifschitz vl@cs.utexas.edu
Manjunath manj@ece.ucsb.edu
Mansour mansour@tau.ac.il
McMillan kenmcmil@microsoft.com
Peleg david.peleg@weizmann.ac.il
Pfenning fp@cs.cmu.edu
Plotkin gdp@inf.ed.ac.uk
Potkonjak miodrag@cs.ucla.edu
Sahni sahni@cise.ufl.edu
Studer studer@kit.edu
Sudan madhu@mit.edu
Weickert weickert@mia.uni-saarland.de
Welsh mdw@mdw.la
Wood david@cs.wisc.edu
Wu jiewu@temple.edu
Agarwal pankaj@cs.duke.edu
Blaauw blaauw@umich.edu
Bobick afb@cc.gatech.edu
Fedkiw fedkiw@cs.stanford.edu
Fogel dfogel@natural-selection.com
Gray grayproj@microsoft.com
Gupta gupta@cs.ucr.edu
Irani michal.irani@weizmann.ac.il
Kaashoek kaashoek@csail.mit.edu
Kesselman carl@isi.edu
Kumar
kumar@cs.umn.edu
Lesser lesser@cs.umass.edu
Li mli@uwaterloo.ca
Mannila Heikki.Mannila@aalto.fi
Mendelzon mendelzon@cs.toronto.edu
Schneider fbs@cs.cornell.edu
Srihari srihari@cedar.buffalo.edu
Simoncelli eero@simoncelli@nyu.edu
Sukhatme gaurav@usc.edu
Tamassia jeager@cs.brown.edu
Tekalp mtekalp@ku.edu.tr
Thiele thiele@tik.ee.ethz.ch
Basili basili@cs.umd.edu
Bowyer kwb@cse.nd.edu
Broder broder@yahoo-inc.com
Chandrasekaran chandra@cse.ohio-state.edu
Bryant Randy.Bryant@cs.cmu.edu
Cipolla cipolla@eng.cam.ac.uk
Faloutsos mwalgora@cs.cmu.edu
Gibbons phillip.b.gibbons@intel.com
Goldwasser shafi@csail.mit.edu
Jagadish   jag@eecs.umich.edu
Maurer maurer@inf.ethz.ch
Murphy murphy@cs.ubc.ca
Nicolau nicolau@ics.uci.edu
Poli rpoli@essex.ac.uk
Preparata franco@cs.brown.edu
Rastogi rastogi@bell-labs.com
Reif reif@cs.duke.edu
Van Renesse rvr@cs.cornell.edu
Majid majid@cs.ucla.edu
Schapire schapire@cs.princeton.edu
Snir snir@illinois.edu
Soatto soatto@ucla.edu
Stinson dstinson@uwaterloo.ca
Rastogi rastogi@bell-labs.com
Whitley whitley@cs.colostate.edu
Zaki zaki@cs.rpi.edu
Zaniolo zaniolo@cs.ucla.edu
Zhang zhang@microsoft.com
Bajaj bajaj@cs.utexas.edu
Batory batory@cs.utexas.edu
Chen mschen@cc.ee.ntu.edu.tw
Davis lsd@umiacs.umd.edu
Dechter dechter@ics.uci.edu
Elmagarmid ake@cs.purdue.edu
Eggers eggers@cs.washington.edu
Feige uriel.feige@weizmann.ac.il
Forrest forrest@cs.unm.edu
Galil galil@cs.columbia.edu
Goodrich goodrich@acm.org
Goguen goguen@cs.ucsd.edu
Govindan ramesh@usc.edu
Jahanian fjahania@nsf.gov
Peyton-Jones simonpj@microsoft.com
Lampson blampson@microsoft.com
Liskov liskov@csail.mit.edu
Maier maier@cs.pdx.edu
Mehrotra sharad@ ics dot uci dot edu
Miikkulainen risto@cs.utexas.edu
Narayanan vijay@cse.psu.edu
Padua padua@illinois.edu
Papadias dimitris@cs.ust.hk
Paxson vern@icir.org
Ramamritham krithi@iitb.ac.in
Rivest rivest@mit.edu
Samarati pierangela.samarati@unimi.it
Schiper andre.schiper@epfl.ch
Shamai sshlomo@ee.technion.ac.il
Walsh toby.walsh@nicta.com.au
Wetherall djw@uw.edu
Wigderson avi@ias.edu
Wolper pw@montefiore.ulg.ac.be
Agha agha@illinois.edu
Ammar ammar@cc.gatech.edu
Arbib arbib@usc.edu
Boehm boehm@sunset.usc.edu
Eiter eiter@kr.tuwien.ac.at
Hanrahan hanrahan@cs.stanford.edu
Harper rwh@cs.cmu.edu
Henzinger tah@epfl.ch
Keromytis angelos@cs.columbia.edu
Freng J.Kittler@surrey.ac.uk
Knightly knightly@rice.edu
Lin lin4tvcg@gmail.com.
Livny miron@cs.wisc.edu
Meseguer meseguer@uiuc.edu
McKeown ffreitas@stanford.edu
Ng ang@cs.stanford.edu
Oja erkki.oja@hut.fi
Ooi ooibc@comp.nus.edu.sg
Paulson lp15@cam.ac.uk
Peleg peleg@mail.huji.ac.il
Sharir michas@post.tau.ac.il
Stasko stasko@cc.gatech.edu
Tanenbaum ast@cs.vu.nl
Zobel jzobel@unimelb.edu.au
Zwaenepoel willy.zwaenepoel@epfl.ch
Altman Eitan.Altman@sophia.inria.fr
Atallah mja@cs.purdue.edu
Bederson bederson@cs.umd.edu
Blum mblum@cs.cmu.edu
Cao gcao@cse.psu.edu
Ceri ceri@elet.polimi.it
Coffman egc@bell-labs.com
Dourish jpd@ics.uci.edu
Dubois   dubois@irit.fr
Dwork dwork@microsoft.com
Fox fox@vt.edu
Godefroid pg@microsoft.com
Gravano gravano@cs.columbia.edu
Hentenryck pvh@cs.brown.edu
Impagliazzo russell@cs.ucsd.edu
Irwin mji@cse.psu.edu
Kearns mkearns@cis.upenn.edu
Kleinberg kleinberg@cs.cornell.edu
Kozen kozen@cs.cornell.edu
Lam lam@cs.stanford.edu
McGuinness dlm@ksl.stanford.edu
Metaxas dnm@cs.rutgers.edu
Miller dale.miller@inria.fr
Minsky minsky@media.mit.edu
Mooney mooney@cs.utexas.edu
Mudge tnm@eecs.umich.edu
Muntz muntz@cs.ucla.edu
Prasanna prasanna@usc.edu
Sarkar vsarkar@rice.edu
Sattler sattler@cs.man.ac.uk
Sifakis Joseph.Sifakis@imag.fr
Stone pstone@cs.utexas.edu
Vishkin vishkin@umd.edu
Wadler wadler@inf.ed.ac.uk
Wellman wellman@umich.edu
Adleman adleman@usc.edu
Appel appel@princeton.edu
Chambers chambers@google.com
Clarke emc@cs.cmu.edu
Das samir@cs.stonybrook.edu
Edelsbrunner edels@cs.duke.edu
Feigenbaum feigenbaum@cs.stanford.edu
Fiat fiat@tau.ac.il
Ioannidis yannis@cs.wisc.edu
Karypis karypis@cs.umn.edu
Kavraki kavraki@rice.edu
Levy levy@cs.washington.edu
Li bli@eecg.toronto.edu
Lynch lynch@theory.csail.mit.edu
Matarić philchanning@cox.net
Mitchell mitchell@cs.stanford.edu
Martonosi martonosi@princeton.edu
McAllester mcallester@ttic.edu
Notkin notkin@cs.washington.edu
Perkins charliep@computer.org
Pierce rcpierce@mail.med.upenn.edu
Rabin rabin@seas.harvard.edu
Reddy sudhakar-reddy@uiowa.edu
Shashua shashua@cs.huji.ac.il
Shenoy shenoy@cs.umass.edu
Sohi sohi@cs.wisc.edu
Stojmenovic ivan@site.uottawa.ca
Valiant valiant@seas.harvard.edu
Walker maw@soe.ucsc.edu
Witten ihw@cs.waikato.ac.nz
Yao x.yao@cs.bham.ac.uk


Read More »